Hepatitis C Antibody Testing
Two primary forms of testing are available for the detection of the anti-hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV Ab): enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and recombinant immuno blot assays (RIE3A). These antibody tests are useful screening tools for hepatitis C, but they do have limitations.
Both of these antibody tests will yield a positive result for current (active) and resolved disease. Antibody testing may not become positive for 3-6 months after exposure, resulting in a delay diagnosis in the acute disease. Immuno suppressed patients such as those with renal failure, those infected with HIV, or those post-organ transplantation – may not express the hepatitis C antibody yet still may have hepatitis C infection. False-positive antibody testing may occur in low-risk blood donors. EIA Three generations of EIA antibody testing have been developed since 1989. The EIA antibody is the main screening test for hepatitis C. The first-generation EIA antibody, which incorporated the c100-3 epitope from the nonstructural NS4 region, was used until 1992, at which time it was replaced by a second-generation EIA. EIA-2 contains hepatitis C antigens from the viral core and from areas of the nonstructural NS3 and NS4 regions.162 A third-generation EIA that contains reconfigured core and NS3 antigens and a newly incorporated antigen from the NS5 region was recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for screening blood products and is now in use at some institutions for diagnostic purposes. EIA-3, with a sensitivity of 97%, offers slightly improved sensitivity over the 95% sensitivity seen with ElA-2. Most centers in the United States use EIA-2 testing.
EIA testing offers several distinct advantages in the diagnostic setting because these assays are easy to perform, are relatively inexpensive, and have high sensitivity. A positive EIA-antibody test requires a second confirmatory assay to make the diagnosis of hepatitis C. False-positive EIA testing may occur in low-risk patients and in patients with underlying autoimmune diseases. These patients may benefit from RIBA assay testing to differentiate a false-positive from a true-positive test.
RIBA: These tests are supplemental assays to EIA testing. Both classes of antibody assays contain the same HCV antigens. RIBA testing is currently in its third generation of development. RIBA-2 uses the same recombinant antigens as EIA-2.
Results from a RIBA-2 assay may be interpreted as positive if 2 or more antigens are positive, interpreted as indeterminate if 1 antigen is positive, or finally, interpreted as negative if all antigens are negative. RIBA testing is not more sensitive than EIA testing, but a RIBA-2 test can be used to distinguish between a false-positive EIA test and true previous exposure to hepatitis C. A third-generation RIBA test (RIBA-3) has recently been licensed in the United States. This assay incorporates the NS5 antigen with the standard antigens used in RIBA-2. This third-generation test produces a reduced number of indeterminate results and is more specific than the RIBA-2 assay.
Two primary forms of testing are available for the detection of the anti-hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV Ab): enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and recombinant immuno blot assays (RIE3A). These antibody tests are useful screening tools for hepatitis C, but they do have limitations.
Both of these antibody tests will yield a positive result for current (active) and resolved disease. Antibody testing may not become positive for 3-6 months after exposure, resulting in a delay diagnosis in the acute disease. Immuno suppressed patients such as those with renal failure, those infected with HIV, or those post-organ transplantation – may not express the hepatitis C antibody yet still may have hepatitis C infection. False-positive antibody testing may occur in low-risk blood donors. EIA Three generations of EIA antibody testing have been developed since 1989. The EIA antibody is the main screening test for hepatitis C. The first-generation EIA antibody, which incorporated the c100-3 epitope from the nonstructural NS4 region, was used until 1992, at which time it was replaced by a second-generation EIA. EIA-2 contains hepatitis C antigens from the viral core and from areas of the nonstructural NS3 and NS4 regions.162 A third-generation EIA that contains reconfigured core and NS3 antigens and a newly incorporated antigen from the NS5 region was recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for screening blood products and is now in use at some institutions for diagnostic purposes. EIA-3, with a sensitivity of 97%, offers slightly improved sensitivity over the 95% sensitivity seen with ElA-2. Most centers in the United States use EIA-2 testing.
EIA testing offers several distinct advantages in the diagnostic setting because these assays are easy to perform, are relatively inexpensive, and have high sensitivity. A positive EIA-antibody test requires a second confirmatory assay to make the diagnosis of hepatitis C. False-positive EIA testing may occur in low-risk patients and in patients with underlying autoimmune diseases. These patients may benefit from RIBA assay testing to differentiate a false-positive from a true-positive test.
RIBA: These tests are supplemental assays to EIA testing. Both classes of antibody assays contain the same HCV antigens. RIBA testing is currently in its third generation of development. RIBA-2 uses the same recombinant antigens as EIA-2.
Results from a RIBA-2 assay may be interpreted as positive if 2 or more antigens are positive, interpreted as indeterminate if 1 antigen is positive, or finally, interpreted as negative if all antigens are negative. RIBA testing is not more sensitive than EIA testing, but a RIBA-2 test can be used to distinguish between a false-positive EIA test and true previous exposure to hepatitis C. A third-generation RIBA test (RIBA-3) has recently been licensed in the United States. This assay incorporates the NS5 antigen with the standard antigens used in RIBA-2. This third-generation test produces a reduced number of indeterminate results and is more specific than the RIBA-2 assay.